Copper, aluminum take a tumble

Trading data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission indicate that speculative interest in copper is at its highest level in the past six months, so markets could be vulnerable to long liquidation.

Meanwhile, exchange stocks of the major metals continue to fall rapidly at a time when, given the summer holiday downtime, they should be rising. This should help to limit the downside. Copper (up 20,800 tonnes) and aluminum (up 17,300 tonnes) both registered hefty falls during the report period July 31-Aug. 4, though the zinc stock draw slowed (down 1,200 tonnes) and nickel stocks registered their second consecutive weekly increase (up 490 tonnes).

Market sentiment is good, but uncertainty over the global economy continues to cloud the fundamental outlook. Although recent U.S. data suggest that some sectors of the economy are performing strongly, a larger-than-expected fall in June housing sales would appear to be taking its toll on the metals-intensive construction sector. Also, the continued weakness of the Euro could hinder the usual European consumer restocking as the summer holidays end. In the Far East, there are fresh signs of Japanese economic weakness, with leading indicators slumping and declines reported in both household spending and household income in June.

Copper‘s failure to break through the US$1,900-per-tonne level has left the market looking a little shaky, particularly with the speculative community on the Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange holding its largest net long position in the past six months. It appears, however, that several market-players, including some of the more strategically oriented U.S. hedge funds, are becoming positive on copper’s medium-term prospects, and there has been little long liquidation as of yet. Further attempts on the US$1,900 level are likely, and the downside currently looks limited to the US$1,850-1,860-per-tonne region.

But how well-founded is this optimism? From a fundamental perspective, the picture for copper is still unclear, and recent events have done little to clarify matters. There is considerable uncertainty about the strength of market fundamentals in the first half of the year. The International Copper Study Group’s upward revision to its global market deficit to 230,000 tonnes for January-May from 46,000 tonnes in January-April appears positive and is far greater than the decline in total exchange stocks over the period (London Metal Exchange, Shanghai and Comex: down 183,000 tonnes). However, we think it fails to account for a buildup in off-warrant stocks during the first half of the year, which would cut the deficit to around 150,000 tonnes.

High Chinese imports of copper are fuelling rising stockpiles there. Indeed, the state-owned Nonferrous Metals Industry Administration has confirmed a buildup of around 100,000 tonnes of stock in Shanghai. In addition, the organization estimates that Chinese cathode imports in the first half of 2000 totalled 329,000 tonnes, with imports for the whole year expected to reach 450-500,000 tonnes. This would indicate that a sharp drop in Chinese buying is expected in the second half, at a time when only 125-150,000 tonnes of refined copper will be required as local stocks are consumed.

The U.S. economy remains a major concern, and recent data have added to uncertainty over the extent of the slowdown. Gross domestic product in the second quarter was 5.2% (well above expectations), and June’s 5.5% surge in factory orders was the biggest monthly increase in the past nine years. However, a larger-than-expected 3.7% decline in June housing sales would seem to suggest an unambiguous decline in the construction sector, which accounts for around 35% of U.S. copper demand. The latest U.S. copper consumption data show that shipments of copper and copper-alloy mill products softened a little in June, compared with May. The June figure was still 12% above the year-ago figure, but this is well down on the year-on-year growth rate of more than 20% earlier in 2000.

Aluminum prices rebounded strongly from an intraday low of US$1,546 per tonne on Aug. 4 to regain the recent US$1,555-1,620-per-tonne range, suggesting that another attempt on US$1,600 is possible in the days ahead, particularly if copper maintains its upward momentum. If it does not, a move back down to the US$1,520-per-tonne level, where there is a chart gap dating back to the rapid upward price spike in mid-June, looks possible. This may, however, be just what the market needs to shake out stale longs and mount a fresh assault on the US$1,600-per-tonne level that has provided resistance since late June.

The risk for aluminum prices remains on the upside. About 190,000 tonnes of primary aluminum smelting capacity are in jeopardy, owing to high power prices in the Pacific Northwest. The power situation remains tight in the region, with President Bill Clinton ordering federal agencies in California to cut power consumption by 5% and local power officials asking residents to cut back on electricity usage as the summer heatwave persists. Even if there are no further power-related cutbacks, the prospect of restarts of recently idled capacity are slim since forward power rates are still well above break-even levels for the smelters. Even factoring in higher production from the Mozal Aluminum smelter in Mozambique (owing to its earlier-than-expected startup) and Alcoa’s and Alcan Aluminum’s previously announced restarts in the second half of 2000, the market faces the prospect of a deficit of more than 600,000 tonnes in the first half of next year, putting substantial upward pressure on prices.

Nickel prices spent the last half of the report period struggling to find support at US$7,500 per tonne, though with little success as they closed in London on Aug. 4 well down at US$7,400 per tonne. Short-covering driven by nervousness over the outcome of the Falconbridge talks and the market’s reaction to the start of the strike in Sudbury, Ont., gave prices a brief fillip upwards on July 31. However, news that four weeks’ worth of stockpiles were accessible by the company before force majeure would have to be declared took any steam out of the first week or two of industrial action. Prices then drifted down from the high on July 31 to close at consecutively lower levels each day for the rest of the report period.

The prospect of a lengthy strike at Sudbury cannot be ruled out since disagreement between unions and the company is said to be considerable. The differences of opinion are not only financial but involve many of the principles that form the basis of the labour contracts at Sudbury. One reason the talks could drag on is that unions at Falconbridge traditionally have taken firmer and more militant stances than those at rival Inco.

The strike is occurring just as nickel is moving out of deficit and into surplus. Supply-side issues for nickel are not the pressing concern they were when the Inco strike hit the market. Increased production levels together with weaker demand growth are acting to undermine sentiment. The strike action at Sudbury will have to last until force majeure is declared, and even then, with sentiment muted and fundamentals weak, it may be an uphill struggle to inject much upward momentum into prices.

Further signs of the easing of the supply side in the nickel market came when Noril’sk, the world’s largest nickel producer, released figures showing that exports from Russia in the January-to-May period were up 17.4% year-on-year to reach 94,700 tonnes. Following the usual seasonal closure, the port of Dudinka is once again open and shipments of metal from Noril’sk will be arriving soon in Western Europe.

Zinc prices spent a second week attempting to break resistance at US$1,170 per tonne. Following the previous report period’s technically firm close above US$1,170 per tonne, prices began the week from a strong position and seemed likely to break through upside resistance. Falling stocks and continued momentum in copper lent support to zinc and took prices over US$1,170 on consecutive days during daily trading in the first half of the recent report period, but, crucially, prices failed to close above US$1,170 and so sentiment weakened.

News of higher Chinese exports led to fund-selling and liquidation of disappointed longs on Aug. 3 and took prices to a near 3-week low of US$1,145 per tonne, as US$20 came off the price to deliver another technically weak close, below the bottom end of its recent range and just under the 30-day moving average. Prices on Aug. 4 failed to recoup the losses and suffered another weak close to end the week in London at US$1,152 per tonne.

Exports from China, which have been growing at an almost continual annual rate over the past 10 years, have become one of the most crucial price-determining factors in the current zinc market. China’s zinc exports for the first half of 2000 were 31% up, compared with year-ago levels, at 296,011 tonnes and are on target to reach an all time high this year.

Gold markets took second place to platinum group metals in the precious metals sector as both platinum and palladium, hit by supply problems from Russia, reached record highs of US$613 and US$851.5 per oz., respectively, in thin trading. By Aug. 3 and 4, profit-taking by speculators lowered prices, and they closed in London at US$568.5 per oz. platinum and US$782 per oz. palladium. With prices gaining considerably in so short a time span, it is no surprise that some retracement has taken place.

Against this background, the gold market looked calm and muted. Prices in the first part of the report period continued their downward trend, though they looked to be consolidating around US$278 per oz. before Aug. 3 and 4. That’s when selling accelerated the fall and took prices through resistance at US$275 per oz., down to a 5-week low of US$271.95. Physical buying was seen in afternoon trading, which provided support and prevented a move below US$272 per oz. and saw prices close in London on Aug. 4 at US$274. On the downside, US$272 per oz. is now the next level of support, and we expect to see this being tested in the days ahead.

— The opinions presented are solely the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of the Barclays group.

Print


 

Republish this article

Be the first to comment on "Copper, aluminum take a tumble"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. To learn more, click more information

Dear user, please be aware that we use cookies to help users navigate our website content and to help us understand how we can improve the user experience. If you have ideas for how we can improve our services, we’d love to hear from you. Click here to email us. By continuing to browse you agree to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy & Cookie Usage Policy to learn more.

Close