In your editorial “Scams and scoundrels” (T.N.M., June 24/96), you classify laboratories into two categories: There are fraudulent labs and there are Canadian labs.
There is a third category of laboratory. These are non-Canadian and do excellent work.
The Vancouver Stock Exchange regulations regarding laboratories are not as you describe them. I think it would clear the air if you were to publish the
regulations.
Steve Cone
President
Cone Geochemical
Editor’s note: The following regulations regarding non-fire assay results and laboratories are excerpted from the “Vancouver Stock Exchange Policy Manual”: Non-fire assay results
n 7.9.1 The veracity of precious metal results obtained by listed companies from foreign laboratories is a significant concern of the Exchange. The concern arises primarily because of the unreliable results produced by relatively unknown laboratories outside Canada incorrectly applying accepted industry techniques, utilizing secret ( “proprietary “) or unverified techniques, or employing unqualified staff.
n 7.9.6 In view of the problems with non-fire assay techniques and non-Canadian laboratories, the Exchange requires that each news release, shareholder report or other public communication that includes precious metal results from an analysis by a non-Canadian laboratory, or from an analysis utilizing any technique other than fire-assay, contain the following information:
a) the analytical method utilized to obtain reported results; b) the name of the laboratory at which the analyses were conducted; and c) the results of any fire-assay check program or the intention to conduct a fire-assay check program at an independent laboratory. All results of a fire-assay check program are to be published in a timely manner.
n 7.9.8 The Exchange may require a listed company to undertake a fire-assay check program at a Canadian laboratory if the reported results are, in the Exchange’s opinion, inconsistent with historic results from the property, the geological environment, or other pertinent factors.
Be the first to comment on "LETTER TO THE EDITOR — Assay results and VSE regulations"