A recent editorial, “Ears to hear” (T.N.M., Nov. 23-29/98), commented on Premier Glen Clark’s efforts to launch British Columbia into high-tech industries. This reminds me of the proposal put forward about 10 years ago by then-governor of Arizona Bruce Babbitt, now secretary of the interior.
Babbitt’s plan was to convert the cities of Phoenix and Tuscon into “high-tech” centres and the rest of the state into a de facto park to provide weekend recreation to these high-tech workers. No more mining, logging or ranching; just nice, green parks for the high-techies and vistas untouched by any person or industry.
Mining in Arizona decreased while growth of the high-tech industry increased, but not exactly as imagined by Babbitt. What Arizona received was an increase in minimum-wage, assembly-line work, not the design engineering or entrepreneurial derring-do of Silicon Valley in California or Route 128 near Boston. What Babbitt, and I suspect Clark, overlooked is that the infrastructure required for a truly high-tech industry includes world-class research facilities — such as Stanford, Berkley, M.I.T. — and a local venture capital industry ready to back engineering innovations with high-risk equity investment. Both Arizona and British Columbia have quality universities, but has the government of either jurisdiction actually provided the resources that are needed to support first-class research?
What economic advice should the governor and premier receive? For starters, killing a high-wattage industry in favor of one comprising low-wage, assembly-line work is economic hara-kiri. All economic opportunities must be seized at flood tide, lest they evaporate before the eyes of our politicians.
Kenneth Arne
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Be the first to comment on "LETTERS TO THE EDITOR — Infrastructure, not imagination, buoys high-technology industry"